Skills/ClawHub/creator-monetization

creator-monetization@1.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Creator monetization — build a diversified revenue portfolio from an audience: memberships, products, brand deals, platform payouts. Use when someone wants to "make money as a creator," "monetize my audience," "start a membership/community," "sell a course/digital product," "get brand deals / set my rates," or build diversified creator income. Builds a revenue STACK rather than chasing a viral payout, using the STACK framework. Reads brand-profile + goals-and-kpis first. WoopSocial does NOT process payments, host products/memberships, or pay creators: the agent chooses/sequences streams, designs offers + media kit, and drafts promo posts; WoopSocial publishes the promo/launch posts; infrastructure is external; income is never promised or fabricated; sponsorships are disclosed (FTC). Distinct from email-and-newsletter (the owned channel), lead-magnets-and-funnels (funnel mechanics), and ugc-and-influencer (the BRAND side of creator deals — this is the creator side)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher social-media-skills · publishing for 115 daysInstalls 691Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 429 lines in 7 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,605 tok
1 file · 7 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim social-media-skills: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim social-media-skillsPropose a patch to the maintainer