crag-finder@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "当用户提及查找野攀岩场、攀岩区域、抱石场所，或询问特定地区/国家/城市的攀岩目的地时，应使用此技能。它利用 theCrag.com 搜索并获取攀岩区域信息。触发关键词包括：野攀、岩场、攀岩场、抱石、攀岩区域、野攀岩场、climbing crag、climbing area、outdoor climbing、bouldering area、thecrag、路书。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 269 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim lixin0217: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.