Skills/ClawHub/cover-performance-preflight

cover-performance-preflight@0.2.4

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Review an existing YouTube thumbnail, social media cover, article cover, or podcast cover design, then turn the findings into a practical thumbnail-optimization and cover-improvement plan. This AI thumbnail analyzer identifies the visual hook, focal hierarchy, title-to-image fit, text-safe contrast, mobile readability, and crop resilience, then produces targeted edit directions and two or three video cover improvement candidates ready to compare. It can optionally read the field your cover is entering: the titles and public counts of what already ranks for the same topic on YouTube, TikTok, Douyin, and REDnote; on YouTube, a competitor's actual thumbnail image; and your own YouTube channel's recent thumbnails. That turns competitor thumbnail analysis, a thumbnail benchmark, and a cover comparison into evidence sitting beside the review instead of one cover being judged alone. Surfaces with no public data — a WeChat article cover, a podcast cover, and others — simply skip that step." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher beatra-ai · publishing for 86 daysInstalls 400Last detonated 7 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagescripts/mcp_client.py:1014 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code"command": f"npx skills update {slug} -p -y (run in {_shell_quote(str(directory))})",Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagescripts/mcp_client.py:1022 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codereturn None if source is None else {"source": source, "command": f"npx skills update {slug} -g -y"}Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,980 tok
1 file · 16 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim beatra-ai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim beatra-aiPropose a patch to the maintainer