cos-effect-prompt-main@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "为 COS 照片（cosplay 角色照 / 写真）生成专业级 JSON 后期指令，可直接配合 Nano Banana （Gemini 图像模型）使用。用户在给自己的角色照做后期时使用——加特效（魔法阵、火焰、雷电、 冰霜、翅膀、光环、圣光、粒子、辉光、霓虹、雨、雪、花瓣、赛博街景）、做综合修图（身体塑形 液化、服装焕新、裙摆/披风风动效果）都在范围内。本技能会输出一份结构化的 JSON 指令： 保底规则（构图/脸/姿势不变）+ 检测分析 + 按需启用的处理模块 + 约束与光影噪点一致性。 请务必在用户提到「给照片加特效」「COS 后期」「P 图」「修图」「加魔法阵/火焰/光环/翅膀」 「液化" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,434 lines in 13 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim aleaaaan: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.