coppa-guard@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "COPPA 美国儿童隐私护栏 (coppa-guard) v1.0.0。 在面向美国市场的儿童向 App / 游戏 / 电商 / 教育产品的文案、隐私政策、 应用商店描述发布前，实时检测触发 COPPA 适用的表述与儿童隐私违规用语， 按风险分级输出命中与整改建议，供 Agent 主动调用。区别于事后深度审计，这是事前拦截。 Use when: 需要在发布面向美国儿童的产品的文案 / 隐私政策 / 应用商店描述前， 实时拦截"面向 13 岁以下儿童"触发 COPPA 适用的表述，以及收集儿童个人信息、 儿童行为定向广告、缺少可验证家长同意(VPC)、第三方披露儿童数据、儿童持久 标识符追踪等" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 604 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wwumit: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.