Skills/ClawHub/contract-consistency-check-free

contract-consistency-check-free@1.0.51

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "把合同里能被算出来、指出来证明是错的地方找出来，每条都带原文证据，不需要付款，也不需要注册。 本免费版执行 当事方名称不一致、日期矛盾、金额矛盾、占位符残留、条款交叉引用失效、定义词卫生。触发词包括 合同一致性AI核对、合同自查、日期矛盾、金额大小写不一致、条款引用失效。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher chenqg618 · joined 7 days agoInstalls 791Last detonated 2 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,811 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈962 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenqg618: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim chenqg618Propose a patch to the maintainer