Skills/ClawHub/contract-comparison-free

contract-comparison-free@1.0.57

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "把同一模板下签的多份合同摆在一起，按「第X条」切开并按条款标题对齐，找出缺条与条款正文差异，每条结论都带条款名与各方原文，不需要付款，也不需要注册。本免费版执行 条款切分与横向对齐、缺条/多条、条款正文不一致（各版本摘要）、条款对照表。触发词包括 合同比对、多份合同、条款差异、合同模板被改、违约金不一致、管辖地不一致、合同审查、合同会签、内审。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher chenqg618 · joined 7 days agoInstalls 746Last detonated 3 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 754 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈730 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenqg618: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim chenqg618Propose a patch to the maintainer