construction-monthly-selfcheck-free@1.0.52
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "建筑企业月度自查包（免费版）共 3 类核对，含 分包结算与产值核对、工程进度款与质保金核对、工程产值与进度确认核对。分段贴材料（每段以 === 检查名 === 开头），逐条给原文依据、可离线复算、结论可被第三方复核。触发词包括 建筑企业月度、建筑企业月度自查包、分包结算与产值核对、工程进度款与质保金核对、工程产值与进度确认核对、月底核对、月度自查、对不上怎么办。本免费版执行 3 类，分包结算与产值核对、工程进度款与质保金核对、工程产值与进度确认核对。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,463 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenqg618: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.