conclusion-assistant@1.0.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "论文结论部分撰写助手。基于11个通用组成部分(论文内容、研究成就、相关背景信息、研究空白/目的/需求、方法/途径、关键结果及评价性评论、结果的意义/启示、潜在或实际的局限性、潜在或实际的应用、研究如何推动知识进步、未来的研究方向)帮助用户检查、评估、改进或重写论文结论。适用于需要撰写学术论文结论、审查结论质量、或..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No findings across 173 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.