concept-validation@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "概念验证中心平台建设运营全流程技能。当用户需要规划、建设或运营概念验证中心平台时使用，涵盖规划定位、政策资金、创新人才、管理团队、产业领域、知识产权、运营模式、合规管控、项目管理、生态建设、合作伙伴、年度目标、阶段考评等平台层面全流程。适用于高校院所、孵化器、产业园区、央企大院等机构的概念验证中心平台建设运营。本..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 409 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim golngod: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.