concept-radar@0.1.3
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "概念雷达——从一个链接或一批作者里，把「值得跟进的新概念」捞出来：去重、给证据、打分、可导出。治的是信息焦虑：不追热点，只留能落地的概念。Discovers, deduplicates, evaluates, and exports evidence-backed concepts from one URL or an author pool. Use when the user wants to track a field, mine an author's idea pool, or run recurring concept research; publishing is optional. Not a news feed — output is evidence-graded concepts, not breaking headlines." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-27 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 1,899 lines in 12 files.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bonniegeng-max: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.