competitive-analysis@1.5.2
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "结构化竞品分析方法论，把竞品分析从「截图堆资料」升级为「支撑产品决策」。仅在用户明确表达竞品分析 / 对标分析 / 差异化分析意图，或明确要求对某个产品、平台、工具做带对比对象的调研时使用；产出经证据分级、借鉴/照抄二分、决策三分类的分析结论。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,399 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim penglj06: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.