company-deep-analysis@1.0.12
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "A股/港股公司深度分析。输入公司名称或股票代码,自动完成 6 步分析流程: 数据采集 → 公司画像 → 产业链五力 → 竞争护城河 → 财务四维 → 相对估值。 输出双产物:公司深度分析报告 + 投研简报 支持单步模式:用户指定"财务情况/财务分析/公司画像/公司基本面"时,按路由表只跑对应步骤并输出对应单文件。 触发词:公司分析 / 深度分析 / 公司调研 / 投资初筛 / 深度调研 / 公司研究 / 行业研究 / 投研简报 / 财务情况 / 财务分析 / 公司画像 / 公司基本面" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Destructive file system command detected. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
rm -f /tmp/{股票代码}_data.jsonFix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.No other findings across 6,137 lines in 18 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim pm2-567: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Destructive file system command detected≈ +4 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.