community-management@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Use to build a genuine community — turning an audience into people who interact with each other, not just with the brand. Run when the user asks how to build community, foster belonging/loyalty, create superfans, start a group/Discord channel, get members talking to each other, or move beyond chasing followers/virality. Reads brand-profile/social-strategy/audience-research. Community outperforms virality, measured by relationship depth/retention, not follower count. Covers the audience-to-community distinction (member-to-member interaction), choosing the space (in-feed -> semi-owned -> owned groups/Discord), recurring rituals, building belonging, and nurturing superfans into advocates. KPIs read natively, never fabricated. Advisory: WoopSocial schedules the content but does NOT run Discord/Slack or show analytics — the human runs the community, the agent drafts. Never fake community; get consent before spotlighting. Pairs with reply-and-comment-writer and crisis-and-moderation." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 470 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim social-media-skills: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.