Skills/ClawHub/collabs-and-cross-promotion

collabs-and-cross-promotion@1.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Creator collabs and cross-promotion — organic creator-to-creator partnerships that swap audiences. Use when someone wants to set up a collab, audience swap, cross-promotion, shoutout swap, joint giveaway, guest spot, joint video/series, a YouTube/IG collab post, or co-promo with another creator. Picks a complementary, similar-size, values-aligned partner, agrees the plan before creating, and co-creates shared-value content (not a bare shoutout) on a coordinated schedule. Uses the UNITE framework. Reads brand-profile + goals-and-kpis first. WoopSocial publishes each partner's OWN posts to their OWN accounts; it does NOT create native IG Collab co-authored posts, run giveaways, duet/stitch, or manage the agreement. A pure mutual collab isn't a sponsorship, but payment/free product makes it one -> disclose -> ugc-and-influencer; partnerships must be genuine; metrics never fabricated. Distinct from ugc-and-influencer (brand->creator) and creator-monetization (the creator's income)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher social-media-skills · publishing for 115 daysInstalls 687Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 441 lines in 7 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,641 tok
1 file · 7 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim social-media-skills: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim social-media-skillsPropose a patch to the maintainer