Skills/ClawHub/cognitive-bias-adivsor

cognitive-bias-adivsor@2.1.3

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "认知偏差顾问。覆盖决策、学习、行动、沟通、影响、管理六大人生领域，基于查理·芒格"25类人类误判心理学"+经典认知偏差理论。六大领域并列，根据用户问题路由到对应领域文件执行诊断与策略输出。触发词：决策、学习、拖延、说服、谈判、影响别人、管理团队、带人等。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher jacksu · publishing for 129 daysInstalls 1,103Last detonated 3d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 4,058 lines in 32 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,380 tok
1 file · 32 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim jacksu: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim jacksuPropose a patch to the maintainer