coding-agent-common@1.0.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "通用的编码代理技能，封装 Codex、Claude Code、OpenCode 等工具。 使用场景：(1) 构建/创建新功能或应用 (2) 重构大型代码库 (3) Bug 修复 (4) 代码审查 (5) 迭代式编码。 不适用于：简单的单行修改（直接用 edit），读取代码（用 read 工具）。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 92/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
process action:kill sessionId:<sessionId>Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.No other findings across 565 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.