Skills/ClawHub/codex-run-to-completion

codex-run-to-completion@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Autonomous Codex run-to-completion workflow for low quota/cota situations. Use when the user asks for an uninterrupted agent run, says "nao me peca confirmac..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher vyctorbrzezowski · publishing for 171 daysInstalls 774Last detonated 25 min ago
$clawhub install codex-run-to-completion
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 100 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈657 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

codex-run-to-completion@1.0.0 safety verdict: Verified (install only) — KillerSkills