codex-cross-provider-session-repair@0.7.6
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Repair Codex Desktop sessions that fail after switching model providers or importing/forking old conversations. Use this skill whenever a user mentions an old Codex session becoming invalid, “model provider not found”, “Codex cannot load config.toml”, remote context compaction 404s, “Item with id rs_... not found”, repeated reconnecting during resume, or a migrated Codex conversation that cannot continue—even when the user only asks to inspect or explain the failure. Diagnose the target session across its JSONL rollout, root state_5.sqlite, config.toml, and logs_2.sqlite, then make a target-scoped backup-first repair with verification and restart instructions." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
Install this skill with `npx skills add WardLu/skills --skill codex-cross-provider-session-repair --global --agent codex --yes`, or use the platform installer documented in `README.md`.Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.completed = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.completed = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.return subprocess.run(worker_argv, cwd=skill_dir).returncodeFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.subprocess.run(["osascript", "-e", applescript], check=True)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wardlu: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.