codebase-explainer@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Produce a durable onboarding artifact for a codebase — writes ONBOARDING.md covering a "read this first" minimum, system overview, dependency map, startup flow, auth flow, and 5-15 important files, every claim backed by file:line citations; refreshes an existing onboarding doc instead of rewriting it. Use this skill whenever the user says "explain this codebase", "explain the codebase", "onboard me", "give me a tour", "tour this repo", "what does this repo do", "where do I start", "codebase overview", "read this first", "I haven't looked at this in months", or "/codebase-explainer" — even if they don't name the skill." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
1. Reads `package.json`, `next.config.ts`, `prisma/schema.prisma`, existing `README.md`. Notes: Next.js App Router + NextAuth + Prisma + Postgres.Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.No other findings across 181 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dennisrongo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.