code-visual-review@2.0.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "Generate visual HTML pages for code review (diff + risk tags), code walkthrough (call chains + trust boundaries), and architecture analysis (module dependencies + tech debt). Three modes with shared dark-theme template." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
<summary>show source</summary> <pre><code>function verifyToken(token: string) { const decoded = jwt.verify(token, SECRET); if (!decoded.sub) throw new AuthErrorFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.No other findings across 825 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.