code-risk-agent@0.1.0
CAUTION· install onlyPublisher claims: "当用户需要扫描代码安全漏洞、审计代码、分析 C/Python 风险、检查依赖漏洞、或生成安全报告时触发。支持云端 LLM 语义分析和本地 GPU 回退。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 73/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: OS command execution function call detected; OS command execution function call detected; OS command execution function call detected. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
"desc": "os.system() directly executes shell commands",Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell."title": "OS Command Injection via os.system()",Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell."fix": "Use subprocess.run() instead",Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out."fix": "Use subprocess.run(args, shell=False) with a list",Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.r"\bos\.system\s*\(": ("CWE-78", "high", "Command injection via os.system()"),Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.- Python: eval(), exec(), os.system(), subprocess, pickle.loads()Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.`mcp-server/server.py` 支持 `--sse` 参数启用 SSE 传输模式,**仅供本地调试使用**:Fix: Namespace tool names and keep tool descriptions literal; no instructions to the agent inside them.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out."desc": "subprocess.call() with shell=True may be injected",Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
7 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- OS command execution function call detected≈ +9 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim a9320: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
- MCP server using network transport (SSE/HTTP)≈ +2 on the totalNamespace tool names and keep tool descriptions literal; no instructions to the agent inside them.