code-review-zh@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "代码审查助手，对代码进行全面审查，覆盖代码质量、潜在 Bug、性能问题、安全漏洞和可维护性。 适用于 PR 审查、代码重构前检查、新人代码辅导、技术方案评估等场景。解决"帮我看看这段代码有什么问题"、 "代码审查 / code review"、"找出代码中的 Bug"、"这个实现方案有什么风险"等需求。 支持 P..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 91 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim olina1ye: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.