code-review-gate@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "AI 代码审查门禁 — 对 git diff 执行全面的静态分析,覆盖功能正确性、安全性、 性能、可读性、可维护性、测试覆盖、文档同步 7 个维度。按 Critical / Important / Minor 三级严重度输出结构化报告,存在 Critical 问题时门禁阻塞(exit code 1)。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
(r"os\.system\(.*\+", "os.system 使用字符串拼接 (命令注入风险)", "使用 subprocess.run([...]) 带参数列表"),Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.(r"os\.system\(.*format", "os.system 使用 .format() (命令注入风险)", "使用 subprocess.run([...]) 带参数列表"),Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.os.system("echo " + user_input)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim terr123123: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
- OS command execution function call detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.