code-refactor-all@1.0.2
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Refactor, rewrite, port, migrate, or modernize existing source code - read this skill FIRST, before searching files or planning, even if the named files are not in the workspace. Covers refactor (split a god module into a package, untangle circular imports, move modules, change a signature across callers, swap an internal API or library across a codebase step by step), rewrite (re-implement a component from scratch or on a new framework, e.g. JS to TS + NestJS), and port / translate code to another language (Python to Go or Rust, pyo3 extensions, TS to Go, Java to Kotlin, C to Rust behind an unchanged C header) with fixture parity. Triggers - refactor, restructure, split modules, rewrite, reimplement, port, convert to another language, migrate to a framework, modernize, 重构, 拆分模块, 重写, 代码迁移, 移植到 Rust, 把 Python 改成 Go. Not for tidying one function (simplify-code), type hints, bug fixes, features, perf, database/schema/cloud/infra migrations (e.g. Postgres RDS to Cloud SQL), dependency bumps, or prose translation." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-27 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,463 lines in 11 files.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim linkxzhou: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.