Skills/ClawHub/code-quality-tool-pro

code-quality-tool-pro@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "|-. 当需要code quality tool相关能力的开发场景,包含规范流程和配置指引. 该工具经过差异化改进,针对实际使用场景优化了实用性。Use。代码质量检查工具专业版为企业研发团队提供深度代码审计能力。在免费版基础能力之上,专业版新增 OWASP Top 10 漏洞扫描、全项目批量分析、自定义规则引擎、多格式报告输出和 CI/CD 流水线集成,满足企业级 DevSecOps 实践需" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher thcjp · joined 6 days agoInstalls 353Last detonated 1 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 466 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,039 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim thcjp: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim thcjpPropose a patch to the maintainer