Skills/ClawHub/co-parenting-os

co-parenting-os@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "协同养育操作系统(Co-Parenting OS)— 离异家庭专业协同养育支持系统。12模块覆盖接送管理、成长记忆库、孩子观察站、亲子关系粘合剂、共同挑战中心、情绪冲突观察、父母成长、成长档案馆、成长阶段引擎、风险预警、驾驶舱、被恶意攻击急救包。当用户涉及离异家庭育儿、协同养育、抚养探视、接送安排、孩子成长记录、..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher web-seeker · publishing for 157 daysInstalls 664Last detonated 12 h ago
$clawhub install co-parenting-os
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 675 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,472 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

co-parenting-os@1.0.0 safety verdict: Verified (install only) — KillerSkills