clawddocs@1.0.2
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "SkillHub documentation expert with decision tree navigation。核心能力: - 知识管理领域的专业化AI辅助工具 - 基于高人气开源Skill深度优化升级 - 移除风险代码,增强安全性和稳定性 适用场景: - 知识捕获、文档管理、信息整理 - 独立开发者与一..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-30 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 340 lines in 2 files.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim thcjp: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.