chinese-literacy-detection@1.0.5
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "面向3-12岁儿童的汉字认字量科学检测对话技能。通过对话交互，基于2500高频汉字（覆盖98.5%语料）的6层分层抽样策略与动态熔断机制，精准估算识字量。当用户需要以下场景时使用：(1) 识字量测评/认字量检测 (2) 汉字认读测试 (3) 词汇量估算 (4) 识字检测方法的科学原理说明 (5) 测试后不认识的字..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 30,215 lines in 11 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wangwang4git: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.