Skills/ClawHub/chinese-fortune-telling

chinese-fortune-telling@1.2.4

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Chinese fortune telling (算命 / 算卦 / 看八字 / 排盘) grounded in classical source texts: a bundled rule engine computes the chart, then the agent interprets it with an explicit school declaration. Computes BaZi Four Pillars (八字 / 四柱) with true-solar-time and 1986–1991 China DST correction via scripts/cantian (buildBaziFromSolar.ts, convertToTrueSolarTime.ts), pattern and useful-god analysis via the bundled BaZi analysis engine, and Zi Wei Dou Shu palaces and four transformations via the bundled Zi Wei Dou Shu engine. Also covers Liu Yao (六爻 / 起卦), Mei Hua Yi Shu (梅花易数), Qi Men Dun Jia (奇门遁甲), Da Liu Ren (大六壬), Qi Zheng Si Yu (七政四余), classical Western astrology, and date selection (择吉 / 择日 / 黄道吉日). Use whenever the user asks to 算命 / 算卦 / 批八字 / 看生辰八字 / 排盘 / 看命盘, asks about 大运 / 流年 (luck cycles) or about 运势 only in a chart context (paired with 八字 / 命盘 / 生肖 / 流年), 合婚 / 合盘 (compatibility), 择日 / 挑日子 (picking an auspicious date), wants a 起卦 / 占卜 divination reading on one specific question, or asks whether a third-party fortune-telling app report (测测 / 生辰) is trustworthy. Also use for 术数 classic questions — 子平真诠、滴天髓、穷通宝鉴、三命通会、神峰通考、紫微斗数全书、增删卜易、卜筮正宗、梅花易数、御定奇门宝鉴、六壬大全、协纪辨方书、古典占星、Chinese metaphysics. Not for Tarot, sun-sign horoscopes, numerology, feng-shui layout, or any medical, legal, or investment recommendation. 中文摘要:以《子平真诠》《滴天髓》《穷通宝鉴》《协纪辨方书》等典籍为判据的命理推理引擎,排盘由随包脚本计算(含真太阳时与 1986–1991 夏令时校正),解读须声明流派并标注典籍出处。覆盖八字四柱、紫微斗数、六爻起卦、梅花易数、奇门遁甲、大六壬、七政四余、古典占星、合婚合盘、择日择吉。触发词:算命、算卦、看八字、批八字、生辰八字、排盘、看命盘、流年运势、大运、合婚、合盘、择日、择吉、起卦、占卜、紫微斗数、六爻、梅花易数、奇门遁甲、子平真诠、滴天髓、穷通宝鉴。不做塔罗、星座运势、生命灵数、风水布局与医疗/法律/投资建议。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher haiyangchenbj · publishing for 26 daysInstalls 743Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 68/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
File type combined with upload actionscripts/cantian/queryFortuneRange.ts:757 · File type combined with upload action — agent may exfiltrate local data filesconsole.log(buildMarkdownReport(output));Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
AST07
MEDIUM
File type combined with upload actionscripts/engine/ziwei.js:1674 · File type combined with upload action — agent may exfiltrate local data filesconsole.log(formatOutput(result));Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
AST07

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,617 tok
1 file · 43 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

12 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim haiyangchenbj: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim haiyangchenbjPropose a patch to the maintainer