chef-cooking@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "AI 智能家庭厨助。输入食材/想吃的菜/饮食偏好，自动推荐菜谱、输出烹饪步骤指导、食材替换建议、多日菜单规划、烹饪技巧问答，生成卡片式交互 HTML 报告。覆盖八大菜系+家常菜，内置 200+ 菜谱库 + 联网搜索补充。Triggers: 做什么菜, 怎么做, 菜谱, 食谱, 烹饪, 做饭, 下厨房, 今天吃什么..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 2,297 lines in 11 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.