ceae-skill@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "面向硬件工程师的根因分析技能。输入模糊优化目标，通过4角色TRIZ小组协作（🔧机械+🧪材料+⚡电气+🏭制造），用第一性原理三层框架+5Why公式拆解+机料法环测穷举找到硬件产品参数无法达标的根本原因，输出关键问题列表+Mermaid因果图+PNG存档。触发词：根因分析、因果图、TRIZ小组、参数超标、找根本原因、5Why分析、ceae。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 606 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yuanzhian-patsnap: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.