cbeta2026@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "大藏经CBETA2026简体版检索与佛学引文核验。支持简单问答和深度研究两种模式。所有论断强制标注CBETA出处（经号/卷数/页栏），遵循德山棒原则——不编造佛经原文。当用户提问佛教经典、经论原文、律藏、论藏、CBETA检索、佛经出处核对等问题时使用。触发词：大藏经、CBETA、佛经、经论、律藏、论藏、阿含、般若、华严、法华、涅槃、CBETA出处、佛经原文等。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 183 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gouchunlei2-png: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.