Is brand-kit@1.0.0 safe to install?

brand-kit@1.0.0

VERIFIED

Publisher claims: "企业品牌视觉资产端到端生成。能力：①需求分析（BA1）②设计生成（BA2，Logo+形态派生+SVG批量+信息注入+小尺寸优化）③格式转换（BA3，SVG→PNG+ICO+校验）④整合交付（BA4，HTML+完整性+清理）⑤品牌规范与扩展应用（BA5-BA6，可选）。全量87个文件（2 HTML + 33 SVG + 51 PNG + 1 ICO）。33 SVG = 3核心标志 + 18 VI系统 + 3品牌规范 + 9扩展应用。6域25种任务。触发词：生成品牌资产、VI系统、Logo套件、商标稿件、名片信封信纸、favicon全套、brand asset、meta-skill-system。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher wangjiaocheng · joined 10 days agoInstalls 670Last detonated 2 h ago

$clawhub install brand-kit

Watch Report an issue

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 88/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations

t+CategoryObserved action

0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle

0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only

0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM

Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/render_svg_to_png.py:515 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.

AST05

MEDIUM

Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/render_svg_to_png.py:132 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.

AST05

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded

≈2,050 tok

1 file · 13 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.