brand-breakthrough@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "新消费品牌0-1破圈策略技能。基于自研五密码方法论（爆点/审美/情绪/空间/故事）和本土化运营三策，帮助品牌从爆点定位、审美系统、情绪价值、空间体验、故事传播五个维度找到破圈路径。含已验证案例（海边宽宽·单店年销4000万）。当用户询问品牌破圈、AHA MOMENT、品牌定位、内容策略、线下体验设计、品牌记忆锚点..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 237 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim sanmuzzlp: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.