bilibili-course-notes@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "B站网课转笔记 / Bilibili lecture & course notes. 用户要把一节 B 站网课、讲座、公开课（BV 号、b23.tv 短链或分享文字）整理成学习笔记，或要把一整套分P 课程逐 P 做成笔记时使用。输出 Markdown：8 分钟以上的视频带「带时间的章节大纲」，要点附原话和时间，逐字稿每行带 [mm:ss]；分P 课程每 P 一个文件，开始前先报每 P 时长和要花的积分。不登录 B 站、不要 Cookie、不下载视频。没有 Key 可免费看一条摘要；完整笔记需要 LinkDigest API Key（注册送 10 积分）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 524 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim jackchew7143: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.