Skills/ClawHub/bilibili-comment-2

bilibili-comment-2@0.1.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "B站评论分析工具。输入B站视频链接或BV号即可获取一级评论数据，支持分页浏览、评论情感分析（积极/负面/需求/竞品），生成精美 HTML 报告。当用户需要查看B站视频评论、分析评论舆情、了解用户反馈时使用。触发词：B站评论、B站视频评论、评论查询、评论分析、评论舆情、看评论、bilibili评论。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher jessdy · publishing for 97 daysInstalls 456Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,644 lines in 8 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈756 tok
1 file · 8 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim jessdy: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim jessdyPropose a patch to the maintainer