bidding-analyzer@1.2.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "专业招投标智能分析工具，深度解析招标文件与投标书内容，自动提取投标准备全流程事项；基于企业知识库自动匹配采购需求并生成技术方案核心内容；识别废标风险、评分弱点与合规注意事项；提供评分模拟分析与中标率预测功能，输出标准化投标辅助清单与竞争分析报告。内置预算-篇幅动态控制引擎。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 553 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim boboy-j: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.