bid-rejection-decision-support@1.0.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "评标委员会（专家）侧否决/废标决策支持引擎。当用户提供"某投标人的具体响应情况 + 招标文件对应条款"并询问"该不该否决""应当否决还是澄清补正""帮我写评标报告用的否决理由"时触发。输出三类成果：① 是否构成否决的判断及法条/条款依据；② 应当否决与可澄清补正的区分判定（避免把可补正的形式瑕疵直接否掉，或把实质偏差误当可澄清）；③ 可直接写入评标报告的规范化否决理由措辞。核心目标：评得准、否得有依据、经得起投诉复核、不踩纪律红线。区别于"废标风险雷达"（扫描招标文件提取风险条款）、"否决雷区体检"（历史案例雷区）、"招投标评标专家"（通用评标问答）。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No findings across 528 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.