Skills/ClawHub/bibtex-literature-review

bibtex-literature-review@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Build Word literature reviews from BibTeX, RIS, CSL JSON, CSV/TSV, or plain reference lists with GB/T 7714, APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, Vancouver, or Harvard bi..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher stephenlzc · publishing for 171 daysInstalls 911Last detonated 38 min ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/self_check.py:111 · Python subprocess execution detectedresult = subprocess.run(cmd, cwd=cwd, env=env, text=True, capture_output=True)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 3,697 lines in 22 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,087 tok
2 files · 22 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim stephenlzc: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
  3. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim stephenlzcPropose a patch to the maintainer