batch-file-processor@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Parallel batch processing of large file sets using sub-agents (summarize, analyze, extract, transform). Use when performing the same operation across many files in a directory, such as generating file indexes/summaries, batch content analysis, bulk information extraction, or format conversion. Triggers: batch process, file index, directory summary, bulk analyze, summarize files. NOT for: single file operations (just read it directly), fewer than 5 files (manual is faster)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 148 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kingkeysun: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.