Skills/ClawHub/backup-3-2-1-auditor

backup-3-2-1-auditor@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "Use when you realize your photos/code/documents exist in exactly one place (or your 'backup' is a external drive in the same room as the computer) — audits your actual data-loss risk against the 3-2-1 rule (3 copies, 2 media, 1 offsite) asset by asset, scores blast radius (ransomware encrypts synced copies too), prices honest recovery (professional recovery lab $300-3000 vs $0), generates the minimum-cost redundancy plan for YOUR asset list, and produces a restore-test drill because an untested backup is a hope, not a backup." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher voronindenis5 · joined 12 days agoInstalls 189Last detonated 6d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 677 lines in 6 files.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim voronindenis5: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim voronindenis5