backlink-guard@0.10.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Check a link source before submitting a site to it, verify a listing after it goes live, and audit a site's own backlink profile for patterns that read as link spam. Use when the user wants to submit a site, tool or repository to directories, awesome lists or guest-post sites, asks whether a directory or link source is safe or worth it, wants to check whether a backlink is followed, asks for a backlink audit or spam check after a Google spam update, asks which sites link to their competitors and not to them, which sites Google's AI Overviews cite for their keywords, or what ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini answer, search for and cite when asked for what they make. Runs the backlink-guard command line; a GOANYAPI_API_KEY and a GLASSER_API_KEY (or an AISA_API_KEY) add the paid signals." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-26 and scored it 68/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
12 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhuyansen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- MCP server using network transport (SSE/HTTP)≈ +2 on the totalNamespace tool names and keep tool descriptions literal; no instructions to the agent inside them.