Skills/ClawHub/b2b-seo-audit

b2b-seo-audit@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "B2B官网SEO全维度审计技能。输入目标网站URL,自动执行技术SEO健康检查、内容SEO深度诊断、竞品内容差距分析、关键词机会四象限地图、TOP 20内容优化优先级排序、90天分阶段执行计划与KPI汇报框架设计。核心洞察:B2B官网的SEO问题不是没做SEO,而是品牌页/博客/产品页/转化路径四个子系统彼此脱节..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher bettermen · publishing for 158 daysInstalls 505Last detonated 39 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,162 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,954 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim bettermenPropose a patch to the maintainer