autoshop-parts-labor-check-free@1.0.5
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "维修工单配件与工时费明细表逐项核对。配件小计复算（配件小计 = 数量 × 配件单价）、工时费复算（工时费 = 工时 × 工时单价）、工单总额勾稽（工单总额 = 配件小计 + 工时费 + 辅料费 − 折扣）、同一工单同一配件重复行、配件数量或工时为负、关键字段空缺或占位符。每条结论都引用原文行号，材料不足时不给结论。触发词包括 汽修配件与工时费结算核对、维修工单配件与工时费明细表对不上、配件小计算错、工时费不对、工单总额对不上。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 927 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenqg618: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.