Skills/ClawHub/auto-geo

auto-geo@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "GEO 生成式引擎引用占位(fore.vip)。输入一个主题或产品名称,执行五步流水线:① 以真实用户问句联网检索 AI 搜索(豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek/秘塔等)并收集回答的引用来源 ② 分析来源站点:主站网址、创作者中心入口、可发布性与权重,优选可入驻发布的高权重阵地并给出内容输出参考 ③ 按 SEO 模板一次性收集补充主题/产品信息(关键词/人群/卖点/背书/CTA)④ 结合各来源站点风格输出合规、营销指数高的 Markdown 文档(GEO 写作:结构化+可摘录结论+FAQ)⑤ 给出各平台发布引导,公众号可走草稿推送直发。当用户要做 GEO、AI 搜索优化、生成式引擎优化、让 A" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher forevip · joined 0 days agoInstalls 296Last detonated 1 h ago

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 416 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,187 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim forevip: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim forevipPropose a patch to the maintainer