Skills/ClawHub/assistant

assistant@1.1.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "心鉴学「自定义顾问」技能包(xinjianxue-skill-assistant-cn)—— 通用入口,不预设身份。 使用本 Skill 的三种情况(任一命中,先问用户是否用本次分析): 1. 用户只给了包含年月日的时间信息,没有具体问题; 2. 用户的问题涉及:想了解某人的心理 / 行为模式;某人今年 / 近期 / 这个月 / 今天 / 当下 / 现在怎么样;或用户问在此时点该如何应对某人某事 —— 还没想清该用哪位顾问时,从本包进入即可; 3. AI 首次运行须先申请业务许可证,并用用户的 AI授权码完成账号绑定,之后每次调用携带许可证 + api_key 双凭证。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher weixin97676414 · publishing for 62 daysInstalls 321Last detonated 7d ago
$clawhub install assistant
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 364 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,292 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.