article-review-platform@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "文章审阅平台（Article Review Platform）的完整使用指南。 覆盖：文章列表查看、内容阅读、创建新文章、更新状态、发布状态同步、审稿流程。 适用角色：小博（写稿）→ 文风分析师（审稿）→ 文章发布管家（发布） 触发词：审阅平台、article review platform、平台API、审稿、r..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 350 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim mayf3: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.