argus@0.4.1
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "Use when reviewing frontend code for design quality — checking design token usage, hardcoded values, dark mode coverage, accessibility compliance, CSS consistency, semantic HTML, or framework API usage. Use when auditing a component, page, or design system for issues. Trigger phrases: '帮我 review 这段代" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
- **Dynamic rule injection** — When run via composite action, AGENTS.md + SKILL.md are read at runtime and injected into the review prompt. Any update to these files is automatically picked up by all Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.No other findings across 1,451 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.