architecture@1.0.2
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Single owner of everything under docs/architecture/ — ADRs, architecture and design documents, and architecture diagrams. Routes each deliverable to the right engine: /mermaid-architecture for Markdown-native diagrams, /drawio-architecture for editable .drawio diagrams, and the optional archify skill for interactive standalone HTML diagrams (used only when already installed in the environment; never installed at runtime). Use whenever architecture documentation, ADRs, or architecture diagrams must be created or updated." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-04 and scored it 65/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
15 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim afonsoft: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.